Very interesting article i found on the net.
Khabardaar, Marathila hath laval tar… roars Bal Thackeray in his editorial in the Shiv Sena mouthpiece Saamna today.
Frankly speaking Thackeray Sr, who is nicknamed as the toothless tiger is simply just one. And with such comments in his newspapers its just like the old guy giving a couple of grunt and feeble roars to let the other know that after all he is a tiger, doesn’t matter that fact that he is toothless and useless. This also goes for his cub Raj Thackeray too.
6 Comments Tell a friendBury
Saurabh Ji, read the articles.... and then tell us who is looking & speaking for 'Seperation/Division/Partition' and who is looking & speaking for 'Unity/Non-division/Integrity'
written by manishbhau 158 days ago
Rating: 0
| Rate Comment:+-
India is a state of many countries
written by funaholic 158 days ago
Rating: 0
| Rate Comment:+-
I dont want to start this topic again.But boss saurabh nobody is asking for separate country for marathis or city driven by marathi people.Media has always wrongly quoted whatever Raj said or says.
"This is one country and we will not accept son of soil theory," Ye dialog khali Maharastra ke bare mein marne ko ata hai Sab ko.
written by saurabh 158 days ago
Rating: 0
| Rate Comment:+-
Gone thru all the links.
All points to political leaders and parties asking for a separate state, could not find a single reference where general public were in that interest.
The only beneficaries of dividing the state are the political parties. They get more autonomy to rule and make money.
Its unfortunate that the "Divide and Rule" theory is often ignored by the intellectual people and gets driven under "illusion" of benefits.
"This is one country and we will not accept son of soil theory." the statement was not issued by the judges in their own interest, it was for the public in general against those who want to divide the faith.
written by sandeshp 157 days ago
Rating: 0
| Rate Comment:+-
good
so why is general public of all those states quiet when their politicians are trying to divide them?
why are no cases being filed against those politicians?
why dont we see PILs against those politicians?
why doesnt media highlight their parochial,casteist, regional,divisive politics and grill them?
why is it that in UP-Bihar anything goes but anything in maharashtra has to be put under microscope?
why have people (intellectual and others) just simply given up on UP-Bihar???
Comments
If Bal and Raj thakarey goes their way, we'll see Mumbai becoming another Kashmir.
What Shiv sena /MNS asking for?
A state cosisting of
--living only Marathi speaking people
--driven by only Marathi speaking people
Are they looking for a seperate Country?
http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/feb/22sc.htm
"This is one country and we will not accept son of soil theory," the bench also comprising Justices R V Ravindran and Markandey Katju observed.
1) http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Lalu-support-for-Mayawati-on-separate-Poorvanchal/227624/
2) http://www.aol.in/news/story/2008011610589022000003/index.html
3) http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Movement-launched-for-bifurcation-of-Tamil-Nadu/274722/
-----------------------------------------------------
1) http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19980214/04550214.html
2) http://inhome.rediff.com/news/2000/sep/14tara1.htm
3) http://frontlineonnet.com/fl1515/15150310.htm
------------------------------------------------------
Saurabh Ji, read the articles.... and then tell us who is looking & speaking for 'Seperation/Division/Partition' and who is looking & speaking for 'Unity/Non-division/Integrity'
India is a state of many countries
I dont want to start this topic again.But boss saurabh nobody is asking for separate country for marathis or city driven by marathi people.Media has always wrongly quoted whatever Raj said or says.
"This is one country and we will not accept son of soil theory," Ye dialog khali Maharastra ke bare mein marne ko ata hai Sab ko.
Gone thru all the links.
All points to political leaders and parties asking for a separate state, could not find a single reference where general public were in that interest.
The only beneficaries of dividing the state are the political parties. They get more autonomy to rule and make money.
Its unfortunate that the "Divide and Rule" theory is often ignored by the intellectual people and gets driven under "illusion" of benefits.
"This is one country and we will not accept son of soil theory." the statement was not issued by the judges in their own interest, it was for the public in general against those who want to divide the faith.
good
so why is general public of all those states quiet when their politicians are trying to divide them?
why are no cases being filed against those politicians?
why dont we see PILs against those politicians?
why doesnt media highlight their parochial,casteist, regional,divisive politics and grill them?
why is it that in UP-Bihar anything goes but anything in maharashtra has to be put under microscope?
why have people (intellectual and others) just simply given up on UP-Bihar???